BUSSOLA ---

Economic and Strategy Viewpoint

Global: Has the US economy stalled?
– The latest figures suggest that the US economy lost momentum around mid year and the Federal Reserve has downgraded its assessment of the outlook.
With the economy now growing at close to stall speed it would not take much in the way of a shock to tip it into a double dip. Some indicators suggest we may be already there (see chart)


            Sign up for our weekly Newsletter and receive the latest ETF and ETC news.
            Click here to register for your free copy


            For professional investors only


            – It remains our view that the economy will avoid going back into recession as we believe that the private sector has retrenched sufficiently to be in a position to begin spending again. Our analysis of the second quarter GDP data also suggests that economy may be stronger than recognised given the surge in imports during the span.
            – Nonetheless, the experience of previous recoveries suggests that when GDP growth falls below 2½% the Fed reacts by cutting interest rates. Today that option is not available and consequently we would expect the US central bank to start another round of quantitative easing in the near future.

            Europe: Growth resumes, but for how long?
            – Growth is back across Europe, with Germany, Austria, the Netherlands and the UK significantly outperforming expectations. The stronger than expected data has to be looked at in context with the terrible start to the year, but the outlook overall remains positive.
            – However, with activity in export markets slowing, can Europe rely on domestic demand to maintain its recent growth? If so, then German consumers must remember what it’s like to spend spend spend.
            – Meanwhile, the sovereign debt and banking crisis have not been resolved and with external demand floundering, we expect monetary policy to remain very loose for longer.
            30082010 1
            Has the US economy stalled?
            Fears of a double dip remain high with the Federal Reserve downgrading its assessment of the US economy this month. Interest rate expectations have fallen again with US Treasury yields falling sharply (chart 1) and the curve experiencing a bull flattening (chart 2).

            30082010 2
            Lower rates and flatter curves are normally associated with weaker growth, but equity markets continue to ignore the message from the bond market. Instead, risk assets have rallied over the past month with equities, credit and commodities performing strongly. Furthermore, performance within these asset classes has been led by the more cyclical industrial and material sectors with emerging markets leading the regions. The stand-off between equity and bond investors continues.
            Our macro view of no double dip suggests that equity investors will eventually win this debate, but the Fed’s assessment and a run of disappointing figures (including another weak payroll) mean that the pendulum has swung in favour of the “double dippers” once more this month.
            We gave our reasons for not expecting a double dip in last month’s Viewpoint1 where essentially we see the economy being supported by increased corporate spending. Strong profits growth and healthy cash flows indicate that firms will raise capex and employment in coming months. Meanwhile, although still fragile, the household sector has already been through a considerable retrenchment, raising its savings ratio to the highest level for more than a decade in both the US and UK.

            Economy hit soft patch around mid-year
            More recently, the gloom has been increased by the news that the US economy was even weaker than previously expected in Q2. Economists now expect growth during Q2 to be revised down to 1½% annualised from an original estimate 2.4%. Although this may sound like ancient history, it adds to the perception that the US economy has stalled and is vulnerable to the slightest shock which might reduce demand. So far, the third quarter is not looking any better and with growth at such a minimal level it would not take much to tip us into the double dip.

            Import surge at odds with weak economy
            To stay with the GDP figures, we believe that many are taking an unduly pessimistic view of the underlying strength of the US economy. The slowdown between Q1 and Q2 is partly due to a smaller contribution from inventory which took 1.5 percentage points off growth. However, the real swing factor was trade which dragged by 2.5 percentage points (table 1). Revisions will make this even more negative as the trade figures have turned out worse than expected with the deficit just shy of $50bn in June.
            30082010 3
            The deterioration in the trade contribution reflects a massive surge in imports, up nearly 30% annualised in Q2, whilst exports rose 10%. Imports are driven by domestic demand and although domestic final sales rose 4%, the increase in imports was remarkably strong (chart 3). It is possible that the trade numbers are overstated, but they tie in with anecdotal evidence from companies such as Maersk, owner of Maersk Line, the world’s largest container carrier and Dubai’s DP world which report significant growth in traffic this year, particularly between North America and Asia.
            30082010 4
            One explanation for the import surge would be that the US economy had lost competitiveness, thus making it easier for overseas producers to gain market share, but this seems unlikely given the performance of the US dollar. This suggests that the underlying economy was performing more strongly than expected with either the gain in domestic demand understated, or that the rise in imports heralds stronger spending to come. Either way this suggests that US activity is on a firmer footing than the headline numbers would suggest.

            Looking back
            Periods where a recovery has appeared to stall are not uncommon. Looking at the last two US recoveries, in the early 1990’s and 2000’s, both saw GDP growth drop below 2½% annualised after the recession had ended. Both were periods where the outlook was seen as “uncertain” by the Fed. In each case the Fed eased, bond yields fell and the economy bounced back (see chart 4).
            30082010 5
            This illustrates how even a normal recovery can be vulnerable to bouts of weakness once the inventory cycle has run its course. The current recovery is all the more likely to suffer given the de-leveraging headwinds on activity. It also highlights a key difference with today: monetary policy was effective in supporting the recovery in the early 1990’s and 2000’s whereas today there are doubts about its potency given the de-leveraging of balance sheets.
            That does not mean that the Fed will not try to do something. Although we do not expect an outright double dip, growth could well be slow enough to prompt a reaction and we would not rule out further Quantitative Easing (QE) in the US in coming months. We do not believe that it would have much effect on the economy, but the Fed will want to be seen to be responding. The impact on the financial markets could be quite powerful, however.
            In addition to QE, we would also watch for the announcement of further stimulus from the administration ahead of the mid-term elections in November.

            China cooling
            Whilst the US is struggling to find growth, China has been struggling to lose it.
            Earlier in the year we were concerned that the surge in money growth combined with the level of capacity use meant a pick up in inflation. That has now transpired and may have further to run given the surge in wheat prices.
            However, our two inflation indicators for China have cooled significantly in recent months as growth has slowed and the authorities have successfully clamped down on bank lending. This suggests that inflation will come under control once the burst in food price inflation has passed (see chart 5). It may be too early for the Chinese authorities to take their foot completely off the brake, but the period of tightening may well be behind us.
            30082010 6
            Looking ahead
            Next month we will review our forecasts for global growth and inflation. At this stage it is likely that we will have to trim our US GDP forecasts to reflect the weaker performance of the economy around mid-year. However, forecasts for Europe are likely to be less affected given the recent improvement in indicators (see below). Interest rate rises are likely to be delayed until late 2011.

            Europe: Growth resumes, but for how long?
            Despite the debt crisis in southern Europe over the first half of the year and the subsequent doom and gloom in financial markets, the European real economy performed surprisingly well. Germany has led the way experiencing its fastest rate of quarterly GDP growth since re-unification, while even Spain has managed to continue growing in spite of unemployment reaching 20%, and fiscal consolidation taking priority.
            The role of Germany as a leader has never been more important both politically and economically. However, as the US economy threatens to grind to a halt, taking China with it, can Europe stand alone, or will it be toppled like the final domino in the double-dip procession?

            Half-time outlook more positive
            After the terrible first quarter GDP numbers, many had written off the Eurozone’s recovery and begun to focus more on the sovereign debt crisis, and the possibility of the break-up of the monetary union. More than halfway through the year and the outlook is rosier. Second quarter growth data confirmed that adverse weather had a dramatic impact on northern Europe in the first quarter, particularly on activity in the manufacturing and construction sectors. However, as the weather improved, so did growth, with Germany grabbing the headlines as it grew at its fastest rate since re-unification. Though these are preliminary estimates, it appears that external demand played an important role in the second quarter. More export orientated/dependent economies like Germany, the Netherlands and Austria considerably outperformed the economies with severe external imbalances, like Portugal, Spain and Greece (chart 7).
            30082010 7
            The second quarter numbers are flattered by the poor performance of the first quarter, but taking the first half of the year as a whole, most economists (including ourselves) will be revising up 2010 forecasts.
            As we progress through the second half of the year, many expect European growth to moderate, but questions remain over the sustainability of the recovery, particularly as the US and China have begun to slowdown. So far, leading European indicators have remained robust. The macro composite indicators from the purchasing managers’ indices (PMIs) continue to indicate a steady recovery (chart 8).
            30082010 8
            Taking a closer look at the individual sectors, we find that confidence levels remain relatively low. Chart 9 shows the latest reading from the European Commission’s sentiment surveys, comparing July’s data with the same period in 2009 and 2007, relative to long-term averages. The current results show a considerable improvement from last year, though with the exception of the retail and the industrial sectors, confidence remains below long-term average levels.
            The contrast between the consumer and retail surveys is interesting. The weaker reading from the consumer survey suggests households remain cautions with their finances. However, the stronger retail reading suggests retail businesses are seeing better trading conditions.
            30082010 9
            The construction sector is unlikely to return to long-run averages in the near future, especially after the structural damage done in southern Europe (and the Baltics) following over-exuberance in residential property markets.

            Euro weakness will help eventually
            In the June edition of the Economic & Strategy viewpoint, we highlighted the upside risk to our growth forecast following the sharp depreciation of the Euro on a trade weighted basis. The Euro is currently down approximately 13% from its peak on the 23rd of October 2009, which is helping Eurozone exporters win a larger share of global demand (chart 10).
            30082010 10
            However as we have previously mentioned, the expected boost from the Euro’s depreciation is likely to take affect with a lag. Also, we highlighted that the boost to growth is dependent on all other factors remaining equal, and the economy being in equilibrium (neutral output-gap). Therefore, if the US and China, which make up 41% of the extra-Eurozone exports, experience a slowdown, part of the boost from the Euro’s depreciation will be offset.2 Indeed, looking at the German PMI sales to stock ratio indicator, it suggests that German manufacturing output should contract by 1% over the third quarter, albeit following very strong growth of 5.3% in the second quarter (chart 11).
            30082010 11
            PMI survey evidence suggests that the slowdown in activity in the rest of the world is already beginning to temper demand for German exports, and that recorded export orders may fall sharply in the coming months (chart 12).
            However at the same time, the leading PMI indicator for domestic manufacturing orders suggests that domestic orders are holding up well, and may continue to run at a 3-month annual growth rate in excess of 25% (see chart 13 on next page).
            30082010 12
            The continued strength in domestic demand for manufactured goods is encouraging. Though we cannot apply this story to the whole of the Eurozone, Germany is somewhat of a sleeping giant, and any sign that its businesses and consumers may be ready to spend is a positive signal for the rest of the union.

            Awakening the sleeping giant
            Since the formation of the monetary union, Germany has had to endure higher interest rates set by the European Central Bank than would otherwise have been set by the Bundesbank. This was required if southern Europe and Ireland was to be kept in check, but the higher rates meant that German workers experienced significant wage deflation relative to its competitors.
            Today we find a competitive German workforce specialised in high-tech capital goods, enjoying a weaker currency and ultra-loose monetary policy. Despite this, German households continue to remain cautious with their spending, fearful that the part-time working subsidies are working like an anaesthetic for a very poorly patient. To a certain extent, that is exactly what the part-time working government subsidies have done, except that the patient is now recovering.
            Unexpectedly strong growth is helping to remove the excess spare capacity in the German economy, which means there will be less pressure on firms to shed jobs over the second half of the year. As chart 14 shows, capacity utilisation is close to neutral levels, and will soon be supportive of employment growth
            30082010 13
            Though we expect growth to ease over the second half of the year, a significant pick up in employment growth in Germany could spur consumer confidence, and with negative real interest rates, and robust household balance sheets, perhaps German consumers could re-awaken, and perhaps, become a new driver of European and world growth.
            Downside risks to keep monetary policy ultra-loose Taking a step back from Germany, the economic recovery in Europe still has to overcome a number of obstacles. Markets have been distracted by the prospects of a US double-dip recession, rather than the European sovereign debt crisis, and the European banking crisis. More details are slowly emerging of the €750bn stabilisation facility, while Greece is about to successfully pass its first joint IMF, European Commission & European Central Bank quarterly review of its implementation of fiscal and structural reforms. The European Commission is expected to give the green light for the second tranche of funding to be released in September.
            Meanwhile, the European banking stress test helped calm market fears over major bank holdings of bad European debt, not by releasing the test results themselves, which were widely viewed as being too soft, but the publication of detailed information on the holdings of major European banks. This helped experts make up their own mind, and confirmed that most European banks are in a better state that feared.
            However, Europe’s problems have not been resolved. The banking system remains vulnerable and requires substantial additional recapitalisation. In Fiscal tightening is already underway across southern Europe, but it is set to accelerate in 2011 with Germany keen to set a good example to the rest of the union.
            As a result, we expect the ECB to keep interest rates on hold for at least another 12-months, and as Axel Weber President of the Bundesbank) hinted recently, extend the 3-month, monthly and weekly unlimited liquidity auctions into next year (there is only one more 3-month auction currently due to take place in September).
            As for the Bank of England, the presentation of the August Inflation Report has led us to question our assumptions about the Monetary Policy Committee’s (MPC) reaction function. Though inflation is now expected to remain above target for the next two years, the majority of the MPC believe that the risks to inflation over the medium term is to the downside, pointing to high unemployment, weakening external outlook, and fiscal tightening. Therefore, we have pushed out our first UK rate rise to August 2011, and only expect interest rates to reach 1.25% by the end of the year.
            We have yet to update our growth and inflation forecasts, but these are likely to rise for both the UK and Eurozone on the back of recent stronger data, and loose monetary policy for longer.



            Important Information:

            The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroder Investments Management’s Economics team, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This document does not constitute an offer to sell or any solicitation of any offer to buy securities or any other instrument described in this document. The information and opinions contained in this document have been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact or opinion. This does not exclude or restrict any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended from time to time) or any other regulatory system. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in the document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. For your security, communications may be taped or monitored.

            Issued in August 2010 Schroder Investment Management Limited.

            Source: ETFWorld – Schroders

            Normal 0 14 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4


            Subscribe to Our Newsletter
            I have read the Privacy policyand I authorize the processing of my personal data for the purposes indicated therein.

            Newsletter ETFWorld.nl

            I have read the Privacy policyand I authorize the processing of my personal data for the purposes indicated therein.